Epps v. United States of America, No. 3:2017cv00646 - Document 20 (E.D. Va. 2018)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. SEE OPINION for complete details. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 08/31/2018. Copy mailed to Plaintiff.(ccol, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Epps v. United States of America Doc. 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA L Richmond Division HUGH ROYAL EPFS, AUG 3 I 2018 Plaintiff, CLERK U.S. DiSTniCT COURT RICHMOND. VA Civil Action No. 3:17CV646-HEH V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION (Dismissing Action Without Prejudice) Plaintiff, a federal inmate proceeding pro se and informa pauperis, filed this civil action. By Memorandum Opinion and Order entered on April 19, 2018(ECF No. 14), the Court directed Plaintiffto file a particularized complaint because Plaintiff failed to identify under what federal law he sought to bring his claims. After an extension. Plaintiff filed a Particularized Complaint. However, this Particularized Complaint was also deficient. Accordingly, by Memorandum Order entered on August 3,2018,the Court directed Plaintiff, within fourteen (14) days ofthe date ofentry thereof, to file a second particularized complaint that complied with certain directives. (ECF No. 19, at 13.) The Court warned Plaintiff that the failure to submit the second particularized complaint would result in the dismissal ofthe action. (Id at 2.) More than fourteen(14)days have elapsed since the entry of the August 3,2018 Memorandum Order. Plaintiff has failed to submit a second particularized complaint or Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
