Green v. Doss, et al, No. 3:2017cv00574 - Document 43 (E.D. Va. 2020)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 01/30/2020. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (walk, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Green v. Doss, et al Doc. 43 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA JAN3 I 2020 Richmond Division CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT RICHMOND. VA ANTHONY M. GREEN, SR., Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:17CV574-HEH TIMOTHY DOSS, et al. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (Granting Motion for Summary Judgment) Anthony M. Green, Sr., a Virginia inmate proceeding5e, filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. The action proceeds on Green's Particularized Complaint ("Complaint," ECF No. 18), in which Green claims that his constitutional rights were violated because he was not permitted to marry during his incarceration at the Middle Peninsula Regional Security Center ("MPRSC"). The following claim remains before the Court: Claim One: Superintendent Timothy Doss ("Superintendent Doss") violated Green's right to due process guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment' by denying Green's requests to marry. Green seeks monetary damages. (Compl. 3.) The matter is before the Court on Superintendent Doss's Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 39.) Green has responded. (ECF No. 41.) For the reasons stated below, the Court will grant the Motion for Summary Judgment and dismiss the action because Green failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. ' "No State shall... deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, withoutdue process of law...." U.S. Const, amend. XIV, § 1. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
