Andrews v. Woody et al, No. 3:2017cv00167 - Document 94 (E.D. Va. 2018)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 05/31/2018. (tjoh, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Andrews v. Woody et al Doc. 94 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division BENJAMIN M. ANDREWS, Administrator ofthe estate ofZachary Tuggle, Plaintiff, V. Civil Action No. 3:17cvl67 SHERIFF C.T. WOODY, et aL, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter comes before the Court on three motions filed by Plaintiff Benjamin M. Andrews, Administrator of the Estate of Zachary Tuggle ("Andrews"): (1) Andrews's Motion to Exclude Opinions of Jack Daniel, M.D. (the "Motion to Exclude Dr. Daniel"), (ECF No. 69); (2) Andrews's Motion to Exclude Imp[ro]per Medical Standard of Care and Proposed Causation Opinions of Nurse Allison Rego Ernest (the "Motion to Exclude Nurse Ernest"), (ECF No. 73); and, (3) Andrews's Motion to Exclude Opinions of William J. Brady, M.D. (the "Motion to Exclude Dr. Brady"), (ECF No. 71), (collectively, the "Motions to Exclude"). Defendants Naphcare, Inc., Demetrice Smith, Tracy Turner, Gwen Drake, Cecelia Faison, and Khairul Emran (collectively, "Defendants") responded to all three motions, (ECF Nos. 82, 83, 84), and Andrews replied, (ECF Nos. 85, 86, 87). The Court heard oral argument on May 30, 2018. Neither party chose to call any witnesses. Accordingly, the matters are ripe for disposition. For the reasons that follow, the Court will: (1) grant the Motion to Exclude Dr. Daniel; (2) grant the Motion to Exclude Dr. Brady; and, (3) grant the Motion to Exclude Nurse Ernest. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
