Interactive Brokers LLC v. Saroop et al, No. 3:2017cv00127 - Document 50 (E.D. Va. 2017)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 08/31/2017. (walk, )
Interactive Brokers LLC v. Saroop et al Doc. 50 B p L E l-N IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SEP - 1 2017 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division l/ CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT RICHMOND. VA INTERACTIVE BROKERS LLC, Plaintiff, V. Civil Action No. ROHIT SAROOP, 3:17cvl27 PREYA SAROOP, and GEORGE SOFIS, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on the PETITION filed by Plaintiff the DEFENDANTS' No. 18) filed Saroop. For DENIED, and panel for Interactive CROSS-MOTION by the this TO Defendants reasons set matter Brokers, clarification. To CONFIRM George forth will LLC be the ("Interactive") ARBITRATION Sofis below, and both remanded (ECF No. and AWARD Rohit and motions 1) (ECF Preya will be the arbitration that extent to the Defendants' Cross-Motion and subsequent memoranda can also be construed as a motion for sanctions, that motion will be DENIED. BACKGROUND Although the Court rendered Financial panel on as styled a as motion against to "petition," this matter comes vacate Interactive Industry January a 5, Brokers, Regulatory 2017. the arbitration LLC Authority (ECF No. 1, Ex. award before that ("Interactive") (FINRA) 1) . was by a arbitration The Award (ECF Dockets.Justia.com
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Terms of Service