Prasad v. Rolfe et al, No. 3:2017cv00064 - Document 15 (E.D. Va. 2017)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. See Opinion for details. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 09/06/2017. Copy mailed to Plaintiff.(ccol, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Prasad v. Rolfe et al Doc. 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division SEP - 7 20f1 SUNDARI K. PRASAD, CLERK, U.S. DISTA1CT COURl RICHMOND, VA Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 3:17CV64 MELINDA ROLFE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION By Memorandum Order entered on July 20, 2017, the Court directed Plaintiff to file a particularized complaint within fourteen (14) days of the date of entry thereof. Because Plaintiff failed to submit a particularized complaint or otherwise respond to the July 20, 2017 Memorandum Order, by Memorandum Opinion and Order entered on August 23, 2017, the Court dismissed the action. However, later that same day, the Court received Plaintiffs tardy Particularized Complaint. Because the Particularized Complaint was received the same day as the Court dismissed the action, the August 23, 2017 Memorandum Opinion and Order will be VACATED. The Court will continue to process the action. An appropriate order will accompany this Memorandum Opinion. Date: P fl Richmond, Virginia M. Hannah United States District Judge 0 2011.J Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
