Goldstein v. Steverson, No. 3:2017cv00018 - Document 6 (E.D. Va. 2017)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr on 4/11/2017. Copy mailed to Pro Se Plaintiff. (jsmi, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Goldstein v. Steverson Doc. 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division DAVID SCOTT GOLDSTEIN, Plaintiff, V. Civil Action No. 3:17CV18 L. NEIL STEVERSON, et aL, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION By Memorandum Order entered on February 8, 2017, the Court conditionally docketed Plaintiffs action. At that time, the Court directed Plaintiff to affirm his intention to pay the full filing fee by signing and returning a consent to collection of fees form. The Court warned Plaintiff that a failure to comply with the above directive within thirty (30) days of the date of entry thereof would result in summary dismissal of the action. Plaintiff has not complied with the Court's order to return a consent to collection of fees form. As a result, he does not qualify for informa pauperis status. Furthermore, he has not paid the statutory filing fee for the instant action. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 1914(a), Plaintiffs conduct demonstrates a willful failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, this action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiffs request to consolidate his cases (ECF No. 5) will be DENIED. An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion. Date: John A. Gibney, Jr. United States Distri(^t Richmond, Virginia Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
