Amazon Web Services, Inc. et al v. Global Equity Management (SA) Pty. LTD., No. 3:2016cv00619 - Document 39 (E.D. Va. 2017)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. See Opinion for details. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 9/13/2017. (sbea, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Amazon Web Services, Inc. et al v. Global Equity Management (SA) Pty. LTD. Doc. 39 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC. and VADATA, INC., Plaintiffs, V. Civil Action No. 3:16cv6I9 GLOBAL EQUITY MANAGEMENT, S.A., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter comes before the Court on five motions: (1) Defendant Global Equity Management, S.A.'s ("GEMSA") "Rule 12(b)(5)^^^ Motion to Quash Insufficient Service of Process" (the "Motion to Quash"), (ECF No. 18); (2) GEMSA's "Rule 12(b)(2)P' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction" (the "Motion to Dismiss"), (ECF No. 20); (3) Plaintiffs Amazon Web Services, Inc. and VADATA, Inc.'s (collectively, the "Amazon Plaintiffs") "Motion to Enjoin [GEMSA] From Litigating More Than 30 Collateral Identical Customer Suits in the Eastern District of Texas" (the "Motion to Enjoin"), (ECF No. 25); (4) GEMSA's "Motion to Strike or Stay [the Amazon Plaintiffs'] Motion to Enjoin" (the "Motion to Strike"), (ECF No. 27); and, (5) GEMSA's "Opposed Motion to Withdraw as Counsel" (the "Motion to Withdraw"), (ECF No. 35). ' Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(5) allows dismissal for "insufficient service of process." Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(5). ^Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) allows dismissal for "lack of personal jurisdiction." Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2). Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
