Mar-Bow Value Partners, LLC v. McKinsey Recovery & Transformation Services US LLC, No. 3:2016cv00612 - Document 50 (E.D. Va. 2017)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 09/30/2017. (tjoh, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Mar-Bow Value Partners, LLC v. McKinsey Recovery & Transformation Services US LLC Doc. 50 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division MAR-BOW VALUE PARTNERS, LLC, Appellant, V. Civil Action No. 3:16cv612 i^^Mar-Bow 7") MCKINSEY RECOVERY & TRANSFORMATION SERVICES US, LLC and ALPHA NATURAL RESOURCES, INC., Appellees. MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter comes before the Court on Appellant Mar-Bow Value Partners, LLC's ("Mar-Bow") appeal from several orders* ofthe United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (the "Bankruptcy Court"), Appellee McKinsey Recovery & Transformation Services US, LLC's ("McKinsey") Motion to Dismiss Appeal of Mar-Bow Value Partners, LLC as EquitablyMoot (the "Motion to Dismiss as EquitablyMoot"), (ECF No. 32), and McKinsey's *The appeals inthis case will bereferred to as ^''Mar-Bow /." A different case pends in which Mar-Bow has filed an appeal of other rulings of the Bankruptcy Court. Mar-Bow Value Partners, LLC v. McKinsey Recovery & Transformation Servs.^ {Mar-Bow 11) No. 3:16cv799. The Memorandum Opinion in Mar-Bow II (the '"''Mar-Bow II Memorandum Opinion") addresses Mar-Bow's appeal of the Bankruptcy Court's grant of McKinsey's Third Interim and Final Fee Applications. This Memorandum Opinion addresses Mar-Bow's appeal of the Bankruptcy Court's rulings on Mar-Bow's objections regarding the Reorganization Plan and Mar-Bow's Motion to Compel Compliance with Rule 2014. As discussed more fully below, see infra note 32, Mar-Bow filed duplicative notices of appeal as to the Fee Application Rulings in tWs case and in Mar-Bow 11 The Court addresses Mar-Bow's appeals of the Fee Application Rulings only in the Mar-Bow //Memorandum Opinion. Given Mar-Bow's numerous appeals in both cases and the related nature of the facts underlying the appeals, the Court notes throughout this Memorandum Opinion which rulings it assesses in this appeal, and which rulings it evaluates in the Memorandum Opinion in the MarBow II Memorandum Opinion. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
