Snyder v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al, No. 3:2016cv00567 - Document 16 (E.D. Va. 2017)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. SEE OPINION FOR COMPLETE DETAILS. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 06/22/2017. Copy mailed to Petitioner.(ccol, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Snyder v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al Doc. 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division p L b r\> IN 222017 VIVIAN ANNE SNYDER, L/ r.l.pt?K. 11 S t>5TfliCT COURT R'THMOMD, VA Petitioner, Civil Action No. 3;16CV567 V. VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION ByMemorandum Order entered on July 25,2016, the Court conditionally filed Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition. At that time, the Court warned Petitioner that she must keep the Court informed as to her current address. On May 30,2017, the United States Postal Service returned the Memorandum Order and the Report and Recommendation entered on May 15,2017 to the Court marked, "RETURN TO SENDER," because Petitioner apparently relocated. Since that date. Petitioner has not contacted the Court to provide a current address. Petitioner's failure to contact the Court and provide a current address indicates her lack of interest inprosecuting this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, the action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court will DENY a certificate ofappealability. An appropriate Ordershall accompany this Memorandum Opinion. M. Harmah D JUH 222017. United Stat^loMrict Judge Richmond, Virginia Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
