Steves and Sons, Inc. v. Jeld-Wen, Inc., No. 3:2016cv00545 - Document 2053 (E.D. Va. 2020)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION - PUBLIC VERSION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 5/5/2020. (smej, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Steves and Sons, Inc. v. Jeld-Wen, Inc. Doc. 2053 Case 3:16-cv-00545-REP Document 2053 Filed 05/05/20 Page 1 of 23 PageID# 64376 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division STEVES AND SONS, INC., Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:16-cv-545 V. PUBLIC VERSION JELD-WEN, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on the EXPEDITED MOTION FOR INJUNCTION IN SUPPORT OF THE AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT (EOF No. 2001) (the "Motion") filed by Steves and Sons, Inc. ("Steves"), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2202. In particular, Steves sought an order enjoining JELD-WEN, Inc. ("JELD-WEN") as follows: (1) requiring JELD-WEN to fill Steves' orders from Weeks 44-52 of 2019; (2) requiring JELD-WEN verification of "to the immediately events and provide factors warranting the notice of allocation served by JELD-WEN on December 19, 2019, and to supply weekly updates on those events and factors while the impairment to its ability to meet demand continues"; (3) requiring JELD-WEN to "apply Steves' 2019 percentage number to the allocation period"; (4) prohibiting JELD-WEN from "deflating Steves' 2019 percentage number by refusing to include in its calculation doorskins that JELD-WEN failed to ship to Steves in 2019"; and Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:16-cv-00545-REP Document 2053 Filed 05/05/20 Page 2 of 23 PageID# 64377 Case 3:16-cv-00545-REP Document 2053 Filed 05/05/20 Page 3 of 23 PageID# 64378 Case 3:16-cv-00545-REP Document 2053 Filed 05/05/20 Page 4 of 23 PageID# 64379 Case 3:16-cv-00545-REP Document 2053 Filed 05/05/20 Page 5 of 23 PageID# 64380 Case 3:16-cv-00545-REP Document 2053 Filed 05/05/20 Page 6 of 23 PageID# 64381 Case 3:16-cv-00545-REP Document 2053 Filed 05/05/20 Page 7 of 23 PageID# 64382 Case 3:16-cv-00545-REP Document 2053 Filed 05/05/20 Page 8 of 23 PageID# 64383 Case 3:16-cv-00545-REP Document 2053 Filed 05/05/20 Page 9 of 23 PageID# 64384 Case 3:16-cv-00545-REP Document 2053 Filed 05/05/20 Page 10 of 23 PageID# 64385 Case 3:16-cv-00545-REP Document 2053 Filed 05/05/20 Page 11 of 23 PageID# 64386 Case 3:16-cv-00545-REP Document 2053 Filed 05/05/20 Page 12 of 23 PageID# 64387 Case 3:16-cv-00545-REP Document 2053 Filed 05/05/20 Page 13 of 23 PageID# 64388 Case 3:16-cv-00545-REP Document 2053 Filed 05/05/20 Page 14 of 23 PageID# 64389 Case 3:16-cv-00545-REP Document 2053 Filed 05/05/20 Page 15 of 23 PageID# 64390 Case 3:16-cv-00545-REP Document 2053 Filed 05/05/20 Page 16 of 23 PageID# 64391 Case 3:16-cv-00545-REP Document 2053 Filed 05/05/20 Page 17 of 23 PageID# 64392 Case 3:16-cv-00545-REP Document 2053 Filed 05/05/20 Page 18 of 23 PageID# 64393 Case 3:16-cv-00545-REP Document 2053 Filed 05/05/20 Page 19 of 23 PageID# 64394 Case 3:16-cv-00545-REP Document 2053 Filed 05/05/20 Page 20 of 23 PageID# 64395 Case 3:16-cv-00545-REP Document 2053 Filed 05/05/20 Page 21 of 23 PageID# 64396 Case 3:16-cv-00545-REP Document 2053 Filed 05/05/20 Page 22 of 23 PageID# 64397 Case 3:16-cv-00545-REP Document 2053 Filed 05/05/20 Page 23 of 23 PageID# 64398
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
