Cave v. Carter et al, No. 3:2016cv00410 - Document 8 (E.D. Va. 2016)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. See for complete details. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 08/26/2016. Clerk mailed copy to pro se Plaintiff. (nbrow)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Cave v. Carter et al Doc. 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division CLETIS CAVE, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. MS. CARTER, et al., Defendants. CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT RICHMOND, VA Civil Action No. 3:16CV410-HEH MEMORANDUM OPINION (Dismissing Action Without Prejudice) By Memorandum Order entered on July 15, 2016, the Court conditionally docketed Plaintiffs action. At that time, the Court warned Plaintiff that he must keep the Court informed as to his current address if he was relocated or released. By Memorandum Order entered on August 5, 2016, the Court directed Plaintiff to notify the Court of his intent to voluntarily dismiss the action or in the alternative, complete and return the consent to collection of fees form within fifteen days of the date of entry thereof. On August 15, 2016, United States Postal Service returned the August 5, 2016 Memorandum Order to the Court marked, "NOT HERE RETURN TO SENDER." Since that date, Plaintiff has not contacted the Court to provide a current address. Plaintiffs failure to contact the Court and provide a current address indicates his lack of interest in prosecuting this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, the action will be dismissed without prejudice. An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion. 2e.1' Isl HENRY E. HUDSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Richmond, vfr'ginia Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
