Clark v. Giuffra et al, No. 3:2016cv00348 - Document 9 (E.D. Va. 2017)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. See Opinion for details. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 02/03/2017. Copy of Opinion mailed to Plaintiff. (ccol, )

Download PDF
Clark v. Giuffra et al Doc. 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA FEB-SJ'T Richmond Division JORDAN TYLER CLARK, ClW, U.S. DISTRICT UCJURT Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:16CV348-HEH V. MS.GIUFFRA, etal. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (Dismissing Action Without Prejudice) Plaintiff, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se and informa pauperis, filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. In order to state a viable claim under42 U.S.C. § 1983, a plaintiff must allege that a person acting under color of state law deprived him or her of a constitutional right or of a right conferred by a law of the United States. See Dowe v. TotalAction AgainstPoverty in Roanoke Valley, 145 F.3d 653, 658 (4th Cir. 1998) (citing 42 U.S.C. § 1983). Plaintiffs current allegations fail to provide each defendant with fair notice of the facts and legal basis upon whichhis or her liability rests. SeeBell Atl. Corp. V. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007) (quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 47 (1957)). Accordingly, by Memorandum Order entered on January 11,2017, the Court directed Plaintiff to submit a particularized complaint within fourteen (14) days of the date of entry thereof The Court warned Plaintiff that the failure to submit the particularized complaint would result in the dismissal of the action. Dockets.Justia.com More than fourteen (14) days have elapsed since the entry of the January 11,2017, Memorandum Order. Plaintiff failed to submit a particularized complaint or otherwise respond to the January 11, 2017, Memorandum Order. Accordingly, the action will be dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiffis free to file a new action that amplifies the factual and legal basis upon which his claims rest. An appropriate order will accompany this Memorandum Opinion. /s/ ^ Datei'K.k 3 2&l*7 Richmond, Virginia HENRY E.HUDSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.