King v. Kiplinsky et al, No. 3:2015cv00674 - Document 6 (E.D. Va. 2015)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr on 12/21/2015. Clerk mailed copy to pro se Plaintiff. (nbrow)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
King v. Kiplinsky et al Doc. 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division RAHEEM KING, Plaintiff, V. Civil Action No. 3:15CV674 SUPERITENDENT KIPLINKSY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION By Memorandum Order entered on November 23, 2015, the Court conditionally docketed Plaintiffs action. On December 9, 2015, the United States Postal Service returned the November 23, 2015 Memorandum Order to the Court marked, "RETURN TO SENDER," "UNCLAIMED," and "UNABLE TO FORWARD." Since that date. Plaintiff has not contacted the Court to provide a current address. Plaintiffs failure to contact the Court and provide a current address indicates his lack of interest in prosecuting this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, the action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion. /s/ 115 John A. Gibney, }r., United States Distric^Judge Richmond, Virginia Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
