Jones v. Ulep, No. 3:2015cv00628 - Document 27 (E.D. Va. 2017)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 1/31/2017. (sbea, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Jones v. Ulep Doc. 27 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division JAMISON JONES, Plaintiff, v. B. ULEP, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) f CLERK. U.S. DISTRICT COURT RICHMOND. VA l Civil Action No. 3:15CV628-HEH MEMORANDUM OPINION (Dismissing Civil Rights Action Without Prejudice) Plaintiff, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, brings this action. On June 27, 2016, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss. Despite the provision of notice pursuant to Roseboro v. Garrison, 528 F.3d 309 (4th Cir. 1975), Plaintiff did not respond. The Court has not received any correspondence from Plaintiff since December 2015. 1 Because it appeared that Plaintiff lacked any interest in prosecuting the action, by Memorandum Order entered on January 12, 2017, the Court directed Plaintiff, to notify the Court, within eleven days, of his desire to continue with this action. The Court warned that if Plaintiff failed to respond, the Court would dismiss the action without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). More than eleven days have passed since the entry of the January 12, 2017, Memorandum Order. Plaintiff has not responded. Accordingly, the action will be dismissed without prejudice. 1 The Court received payments towards his filing fee from the institution until September 2016 when he had paid the fee in full. Dockets.Justia.com An appropriate Order shall issue. Isl HENRY E. HUDSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Date: Richmond, Virginia 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
