Faison v. Kath et al, No. 3:2015cv00454 - Document 11 (E.D. Va. 2016)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. See for complete details. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. on 08/01/2016. Clerk mailed copy to pro se Plaintiff. (nbrow)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Faison v. Kath et al Doc. 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division SHAUN A. FAISON, Plaintiff, V. Civil Action No. 3:15CV454 N. D. KATH,e/ aL, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, a federal inmate proceeding pro se and informa paiiperis, filed this 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 action. By Memorandum Order entered on June 21, 2016, the Court directed Plaintiff, within fourteen (14) days of the date of entry thereof, to file a particularized complaint because his current allegations failed to provide each defendant with fair notice of the facts and legal basis upon which his or her liability rests. The Court warned Plaintiff that the failure to submit a particularized complaint would result in the dismissal of the action. By Memorandum Order entered on July 15, 2016, the Court denied Plaintiffs Motion for Appointment of Counsel and instructed Plaintiff that he must comply with the directives of the June 21, 2016 Memorandum Order within eleven (11) days of the date of entry thereof. More than eleven (11) days have elapsed since the entry of the July 15, 2016 Memorandum Order. Plaintiff failed to submit a particularized complaint or otherwise respond to the July 15, 2016 Memorandum Order. Accordingly, the action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. An appropriate Order will accompany this Memorandum Opinion. Date: Richmond, Virginia John A. Gibney, Jr. United States Distri6t Ji^gc Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
