Berenyi v. Stolle, No. 3:2015cv00419 - Document 6 (E.D. Va. 2015)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. See for complete details. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 15cv419. (ccol, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Berenyi v. Stolle Doc. 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division CHRISTOPHER BERENYI, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 3:15CV419 KEN STOLLE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION By Memorandum Order entered on August 12, 2015, the Court conditionally docketed Plaintiffs action. At that time, the Court directed Plaintiff to affirm his intention to pay the full filing fee by signing and returning a consent to the collection of fees form. The Court warned Plaintiff that a failure to comply with the above directive within thirty (30) days of the date of entry thereof would result in summary dismissal of the action. Plaintiff has not complied with the Court's order to return a consent to collection of fees form. As a result, he does not qualify for informa pauperis status. Furthermore, he has not paid the statutory filing fee for the instant action. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 1914(a). Plaintiffs conduct demonstrates a willful failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4l(b). Accordingly, this action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion. 1 2015 Date: SEP 1 Richmond, Virginia / Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
