Gerald, et al v. Higgs, Jr. et al, No. 3:2015cv00283 - Document 15 (E.D. Va. 2015)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge James R. Spencer on 08/19/2015. Copies mailed to Plaintiffs Fitzroy Pink and Charles Bumbrey. (walk, )

Download PDF
Gerald, et al v. Higgs, Jr. et al Doc. 15 i 11 g IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT RICHMONn \/A ' JEREMY GERALD, et aL, Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 3;15CV283 V. JOSEPH A. HIGGS,e/fl/., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION By Memorandum Order entered on June 4,2015, the Court conditionally docketed the action. At that time, the Court directed each Plaintiff to affirm his intention to pay the full filing fee by signing and returning a consent to the collection of fees form. The Court warned each Plaintiff that a failure to comply with the above directive within thirty (30) days of the date of entry thereof would result in summary dismissal of the action. Neither Fitzroy Pink nor Charles Bumbrey has complied with the Court's order to return a consent to collection of fees form. As a result, they do not qualify for informa pauperis status. Furthermore, they have not paid the statutory filing fee for the instant action. See 28 U.S.C. ยง1914(a). Pink's and Bumbrey's conduct demonstrates a willful failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, all claims by Pink and Bumbrey will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion. k! Date: 8 Richmond, Virginia James R. Spencer Senior U. S. District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.