Price v. Thacker, et al, No. 3:2015cv00231 - Document 5 (E.D. Va. 2015)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 6/12/2015. (sbea, )

Download PDF
Price v. Thacker, et al Doc. 5 « IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division IL : JUN I 2 20l^ CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT OOORT RICHMOND. VA LAWRY PRICE, Plaintiff, V. Civil Action No. 3:15CV231 SANDRA THACKER, et aL, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION By Memorandum Order entered on April 24, 2015, the Court conditionally docketed Plaintiffs action. At that time, the Court directed Plaintiffto affirm his intention to pay the full filing fee by signing and returning a consent to the collection of fees form. The Court warned Plaintiff that a failure to comply with the above directive within thirty (30) days of the date of entry thereof would result in summary dismissal of the action. Plaintiff has not complied with the Court's order to return a consent to collection of fees form. As a result, he does not qualify for informa pauperis status. Furthermore, he has not paid the statutory filing fee for the instant action. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). Plaintiff's conduct demonstrates a willful failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, this action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion. Date: J(JM j ^ 2015 M. Hannah Lauck United States District Ju'dge Richmond, Virginia Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.