Lumpkin v. Virginia Peninsula Regional Jail et al, No. 3:2015cv00229 - Document 8 (E.D. Va. 2015)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 6/15/2015. (sbea, )

Download PDF
Lumpkin v. Virginia Peninsula Regional Jail et al Doc. 8 rx IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA JUN I 5 2015 Richmond Division CLLHK DANIEL LEE LUMPKIN, IJIS, fiict court ——S!£fjMPNOi VA Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:15CV229-HEH V. VIRGINIA PENINSULA REGIONAL JAIL, ef ai. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (Dismissing Civil Rights Action Without Prejudice) By Memorandum Order entered on April 24, 2015, the Court conditionally docketed Plaintiffs action. The Court directed Plaintiff to return his informa pauperis affidavit and affirm his intention to pay the full filing fee by signing and returning a consent to the collection of fees form. The Court warned Plaintiff that a failure to comply with either of the above directives within thirty (30) days of the date of entry thereof would result in summary dismissal of the action. Plaintiff has not complied with the order of this Court. Plaintiff failed to return the in forma pauperis affidavit and a consent to collection of fees form. As a result, he does not qualify for informa pauperis status. Furthermore, he has not paid the statutoiy filing fee for the instant action. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). Such conduct demonstrates a willful failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, this action will be dismissed without prejudice. An appropriate Order shall issue. /s/ HENRY E. HUDSON Date: UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Richmond, Virginia Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.