Lenz v. United States Federal Bureau of Prisons, No. 3:2015cv00139 - Document 5 (E.D. Va. 2015)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 5/8/2015. Copy of Memorandum Order was mailed to Plaintiff. (sbea, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Lenz v. United States Federal Bureau of Prisons Doc. 5 fl IN THE UNITED IL jr. may - 8 2015 STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division RICHl/iOND. VA DANIEL ELLIS MOSES LENZ, Plaintiff, V. Civil Action No. 3:15CV139 UNKNOWN, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION By Memorandum Order conditionally directed docketed Daniel Ellis entered on March this Moses action. Lenz to At 18, 2015, the Court that time, the Court statement under submit a oath or penalty of perjury that: (A) (B) (C) (D) Identifies the nature of the action; States his belief that he is entitled to relief; Avers that he is unable to prepay fees or give security therefor; and, Includes a statement of the assets he possesses. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). The Court provided Lenz with an in forma pauperis affidavit form for this purpose. Additionally, the intention to pay the consent to that failure a within the thirty Court full collection to comply (30) days directed filing of of to affirm his fee by signing and returning a fees with Lenz form. either the date The of of the Court above entry warned Lenz directives thereof would result in summary dismissal of the action. Dockets.Justia.com Lenz has not complied with failed to result, return he Furthermore, instant does he 41(b). a consent not has action. demonstrates P. the to qualify not See willful Accordingly, paid 28 the order of collection for the ^ failure this of § pauperis 1914(a). will be fee Such See Lenz form. filing to prosecute. action fees forma statutory U.S.C. this Court. Fed. dismissed As a status. for the conduct R. Civ. without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of the Memorandum Opinion to Lenz. /s/ Robert E. Payne Senior United States District Judge Date: ^ t^l'7 Richmond, ^Arginia
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
