Gregory v. Stolle et al, No. 3:2014cv00806 - Document 12 (E.D. Va. 2015)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 08/25/2015. Copy mailed to plaintiff on 8/25/2015.(tjoh, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Gregory v. Stolle et al Doc. 12 p p IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT p\ Hi AUG 2 5 2015 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT RICHMOND, VA CHRISTOPHER GREGORY, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. V. KEN STOLLE, 3;14CV806 et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Christopher Gregory, and m order forma pauperis, to state a a Virginia inmate filed this 42 U.S.C. viable claim under proceeding pro § 1983 action. 42 U.S.C. § se In 1983, a plaintiff must allege that a person acting under color of state law deprived him or her of a constitutional right or of a right conferred by a law of the United States. Action Against Poverty in Roanoke Valley, Cir. 1998) (citing 42 U.S.C. § 1983) . See Dowe v. 145 F.3d 653, Total 658 {4th In his current Complaint, Gregory does not provide each defendant with fair notice of u— the facts and Accordingly, Court legal basis upon which his liability by Memorandum Order entered on August 3, directed within fourteen Court warned particularized Gregory (14) to days submit of Gregory that complaint would the a particularized date the result of entry failure in the to rests. 2015, [rjU the complaint thereof. submit dismissal of The the the action. Dockets.Justia.com More than fourteen of the submit August a 3, 2015 (14) days have elapsed since the entry Memorandum Order. Gregory particularized complaint or otherwise August 3, 2015 Memorandum Order. Accordingly, failed respond to to the the action will be dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Memorandum Opinion to Gregory. I t i s so ORDERED. /O CJ C Date: Richmond, t^rginia ^ Robert E. Payne Senior IMited States District Judge
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
