Smith v. Lane et al, No. 3:2014cv00613 - Document 9 (E.D. Va. 2015)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 02/12/2015. (tjoh, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Smith v. Lane et al Doc. 9 IP IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA i u fcB 12 2015 CL I E i rUK^CSHMDSgICvIC0URT Richmond Division KYLE D. SMITH, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:14CV613-HEH LT. LANE, etal, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (Dismissing Action Without Prejudice) On October 10,2014, the Court conditionally docketed Plaintiffs action. Plaintiff requested leave to proceed informapauperis. By Memorandum Order entered on January 9, 2015, the Court directed Plaintiff to pay an initial partial filing fee of $.72 or state under penalty of perjury that he did not have sufficient assets to pay such a fee within eleven (11) days of the date of entry thereof. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(b)(1). Plaintiff has neither paid the initial partial filing fee nor averred that he cannot pay such a fee. Therefore, Plaintiff is not entitled to proceed informa pauperis. Plaintiffs disregard of the Court's directives warrants dismissal of the action. Accordingly, the action will be dismissed without prejudice. An appropriate Order will accompany this Memorandum Opinion. WDate:^L1-2-70/1 Is/ Henry E. Hudson United States District Judge Richmond, Virginia Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
