Hardy v. Detective's Office et al, No. 3:2014cv00083 - Document 13 (E.D. Va. 2015)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 2/18/15. Copy sent: Yes (tdai, )

Download PDF
Hardy v. Detective's Office et al Doc. 13 I IN THE UNITED L I B STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA FEB I9 2015 Richmond Division \ii CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT KEYON SANTE HARDY, RICHMOND, VA Plaintiff, Civil Action No. v. DETECTIVE'S OFFICE, 3:14CV83 et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Keyon Sante Hardy, in forma pauperis, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se and filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. to state a viable claim under 42 U.S.C. allege that a person acting under § 1983, color of In order a plaintiff must state law deprived him or her of a constitutional right or of a right conferred by a law of Poverty the in United Roanoke (citing 42 U.S.C. Complaint notice of § (2007) 1983). 8) facts liability rests. 555 Valley, (ECF No. the States. See 145 v. 653, Total 658 Action Against (4th allegations Cir. in his provide each defendant legal See Bell Atl. (quoting Conley v. Accordingly, F.3d Hardy's fail to and Dowe basis Corp. upon which v. Twombly, Gibson, 355 U.S. Amended with fair his 550 41, 1998) or U.S. 47 her 544, (1957)). by Memorandum Order entered on January 9, 2015, the Court directed Hardy to submit a particularized complaint within fourteen (14) days of the date of entry thereof. The Court Dockets.Justia.com warned Hardy that the failure to submit the particularized complaint would result in the dismissal of the action. More than fourteen (14) days have elapsed since the of the January 9, 2015 Memorandum Order. entry Hardy failed to submit a particularized complaint or otherwise respond to the January 9, 2015 Memorandum Order. Accordingly, the action will be dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Memorandum Opinion to Hardy. It is so ORDERED. /s/ ALf Robert E. Payne Senior United States District Judge Richmond, Date Virginia ' ?<&U*J>ff /ijM

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.