Allison v. Holloway, No. 3:2013cv00824 - Document 20 (E.D. Va. 2014)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. on 11/14/2014. Copy mailed to Petitioner. (walk, )

Download PDF
Allison v. Holloway Doc. 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division LAMAR S. HILL, Petitioner, V. Civil Action No. 3:12CV174 HAROLD W. CLARKE, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION Lamar S. Hill, a Virginia state prisoner proceeding by counsel and in forma pauperis, brings this petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 ("§ 2254 Petition") challenging his conviction in the Circuit Court of the City of Richmond, Virginia ("Circuit Court") for possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute. By Memorandum Opinion and Order entered March 20, 2013, the Court dismissed Claim Two and the state law portions of Claims Three and Four, denied Respondent's Motion to Dismiss in part, and ordered Respondent to file further briefing. Hill v. Clarke, No. 3:12CV174, 2013 WL 1165256, at *1, *6 (E.D. Va. Mar. 20, 2013). By Memorandum Opinion and Order entered January 4, 2014, the Court dismissed Claims Three and Four and appointed counsel for Hill for further briefing on Claim One. Hill v. Clarke, No. 3:12CV174, 2014 WL 31496, at *5-6 (E.D. Va. Jan. 4, 2014). In his remaining claim. Hill argues entitlement to relief based upon the following:' Claim One: "The Supreme Court of Virginia erred in finding that Hill was not 'in custody' for purposes of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) and that the trial court properly denied his motion to ' Hill lists his claims in bold. The Court removes the emphasis from the quotations to Hill's submissions. Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.