Munford v. Meherrin River Regional Jail, No. 3:2013cv00389 - Document 26 (E.D. Va. 2015)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 2/23/2015. Copy mailed as directed. (sbea, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Munford v. Meherrin River Regional Jail Doc. 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP VIRGINIA Richmond Division FEB 2 3 2015 NATAJH DEVON MUNFORD, CLERK, U.S. ni.STRICT COUHl RICHMOND. VA Plaintiff, V. Civil Action No. MEHERRIN RIVER REGIONAL JAIL, ^ 3:13CV389 al. , Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Natajh Devon Munford, and forma pauperis, order to state a a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se filed this viable 42 U.S.C. under claim § U.S.C. 42 1983 action. § In 1983, a plaintiff must allege that a person acting under color of state law deprived him or her of a constitutional right or of a right conferred by a law of the United States. See Dowe v. Action Against Poverty in Roanoke Valley, 145 F.3d 653, Cir. 1998) complaint (citing (ECF No. 42 23), U.S.C. § 1983). Total 658 Munford's (4th current provides only the barest recitation of facts and fails to provide a cogent explanation as to how each listed defendant purportedly violated Muford's rights. Accordingly, by Memorandum Order entered on January 9, 2015, the Court directed Munford complaint within thereof. The fourteen Court to submit (14) days warned Munford the particularized complaint would the a second of that the the result particularized date of entry failure to submit in the dismissal of action. Dockets.Justia.com iyiore than of the submit January a fourteen 9, 2015 (14) days have Memorandum Order. particularized complaint January 9, elapsed since the 2015 Memorandum Order. or Munford otherwise Accordingly, entry failed respond to to the the action will be dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Memorandum Opinion to Munford. I t i s so ordered. /s/ Robert E. Payne Senior United States District Judge Date: Z Richmond, Virginia
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
