Harrell v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. 3:2013cv00153 - Document 12 (E.D. Va. 2013)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION (signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 11/5/2013) (rpiz)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED FOR THE STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division ROGER LEE HARRELL, Petitioner, v. Civil Action No. 3:13CV153 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION By Memorandum Opinion and Order entered on October 1, the Court U.S.C. denied a successive, unauthorized ยง 2254 filed by Roger Lee Harrell. October 15, 2013, the Court Reconsideration from Harrell. The United States recognizes three grounds accommodate an account for correct a (citing 1419 F.R.D. v. Md. 625, demonstrate law or 994 Corp. 1991); v. Atkins (S.D. basis F.2d for the v. Miss. at prevent 1076, Koppers 28 On for Fourth Circuit 59(e): "(1) to law; (2) to or (3) to trial; manifest 1081 Co., Marathon (4th 771 F. injustice." Cir. 1993) Supp. 1406, LeTourneau Co., Harrell fails 1990)). granting 7-8.) Motion controlling available Staton, any in error 626 for relief under Rule not Weyerhaeuser (D. Appeals change of a under 9.) evidence clear Hutchinson for intervening new of (ECF Nos. received (ECF No. Court petition 2013 relief under Rule 130 to 59(e).
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
