Heath v. Clark et al, No. 3:2012cv00697 - Document 12 (E.D. Va. 2013)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge James R. Spencer on 9/30/13. Copy sent: yes(tdai, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division BRUCE C. HEATH, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 3:12CV697 HAROLD CLARK, et aL, Defendants MEMORANDUM OPINION By Memorandum Order entered on November 29, 2012, the Court conditionally docketed the present action. The November 29, 2012 Memorandum Order warned Plaintiff that the Court would dismiss the action if he failed to keep the Court informed of his current address. On September 5, 2013, the United States Postal Service returned an August 19, 2013 Memorandum Order to the Court marked, "RETURN TO SENDER," "NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED," and "UNABLE TO FORWARD." Since that date, Plaintiff has not contacted the Court to provide a current address. Plaintiffs failure to contact the Court and provide a current address indicates his lack of interest in prosecuting this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, the action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion. James R. Spencer Date: f-30-/0 Richmond, Virginia United States District Judge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.