Ingram v. Vereen et al, No. 3:2012cv00052 - Document 17 (E.D. Va. 2012)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 11/9/12. Copy sent: Yes(tdai, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division KEVIN D. INGRAM, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 3:12CV52 D.VEREEN,e/a/., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION By Memorandum Order entered on February 14, 2012, the Court conditionally docketed Plaintiffs civil action and warned Plaintiffthat he must keep the Court informed of his current address. By Memorandum Order entered on August 20, 2012, the Court granted Plaintiff in forma pauperis status and filed the action. On October 1, 2012, the United States Postal Service returned the August 20, 2012 Memorandum Order to the Court marked "RETURN TO SENDER[J NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED[J UNABLE TO FORWARD." The envelope also shows that the Postal Service unsuccessfully attempted to forward the Memorandum Order to an address in Roanoke, Virginia before returning the Memorandum Order to the Court. Plaintiff has not contacted the Court to provide a current address. Plaintiffs failure to contact the Court and provide a current address indicates his lack of interest in prosecuting this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, the action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion. W^ E. Hudson Henry /s/ Date: ^"^-2 "v Richmond, Virginia United States District Judge
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
