L&W Supply Corporation v. Driven Construction, Inc. et al, No. 2:2022cv00437 - Document 18 (E.D. Va. 2023)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Plaintiff's 12 Motion for Default Judgment is GRANTED. The Court ENTERS default judgment against Defendant Driven Construction, Inc. Plaintiff is AWARDED $145,484.55 in damages to be recovered from Defendant, and Plaintiff's request for $9,276.59 in pre-judgment interest is GRANTED. The request for post-judgment interest is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's request for reasonable attorney's fees is GRANTED in the amount of $6,665.67. All pre-judgment and post-judgment interest shall be paid at the prevailing interest rate calculated from the date of entry of this Order. Defendant is ORDERED to pay Plaintiff a final judgment of $152,150.22 within SIXTY (60) DAYS of the date of this Order. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 4/12/23. (jhie, )

Download PDF
L&W Supply Corporation v. Driven Construction, Inc. et al Doc. 18 Case 2:22-cv-00437-RAJ-RJK Document 18 Filed 04/12/23 Page 1 of 13 PageID# 121 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:22-cv-00437-RAJ-RJK Document 18 Filed 04/12/23 Page 2 of 13 PageID# 122 Case 2:22-cv-00437-RAJ-RJK Document 18 Filed 04/12/23 Page 3 of 13 PageID# 123 Case 2:22-cv-00437-RAJ-RJK Document 18 Filed 04/12/23 Page 4 of 13 PageID# 124 Case 2:22-cv-00437-RAJ-RJK Document 18 Filed 04/12/23 Page 5 of 13 PageID# 125 Case 2:22-cv-00437-RAJ-RJK Document 18 Filed 04/12/23 Page 6 of 13 PageID# 126 Case 2:22-cv-00437-RAJ-RJK Document 18 Filed 04/12/23 Page 7 of 13 PageID# 127 Case 2:22-cv-00437-RAJ-RJK Document 18 Filed 04/12/23 Page 8 of 13 PageID# 128 Case 2:22-cv-00437-RAJ-RJK Document 18 Filed 04/12/23 Page 9 of 13 PageID# 129 Case 2:22-cv-00437-RAJ-RJK Document 18 Filed 04/12/23 Page 10 of 13 PageID# 130 Case 2:22-cv-00437-RAJ-RJK Document 18 Filed 04/12/23 Page 11 of 13 PageID# 131 Case 2:22-cv-00437-RAJ-RJK Document 18 Filed 04/12/23 Page 12 of 13 PageID# 132 Case 2:22-cv-00437-RAJ-RJK Document 18 Filed 04/12/23 Page 13 of 13 PageID# 133

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.