Selby v. Social Security Administration, No. 2:2021cv00666 - Document 19 (E.D. Va. 2023)
Court Description: FINAL ORDER: The Court hereby ADOPTS in full the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge filed on December 23, 2022. ECF No. 18. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is DENIED, ECF No. 12, the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, ECF No. 13, and the final decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. Copies of this Order sent as DIRECTED on 1.23.23. Signed by Chief District Judge Mark S. Davis and filed on 1/23/23. (epri, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Selby v. Social Security Administration Doc. 19 Case 2:21-cv-00666-MSD-RJK Document 19 Filed 01/23/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID# 173 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division TELESIA Sw^ Plaintiff/ Civil No. 2:21cv666 V. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendcint. FINAL ORDER Telesia S. (''Plaintiff"), pro se, brought this action seeking judicial review of the decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (the "Commissioner") to deny her claim for disability benefits under the Social Security Act. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge for a report and recommendation, ยง 636(b)(1)(B) Procedure. pursuant and Rule to the 72(b) of provisions the Federal of 28 Rules U.S.C. of Civil The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation was filed on December 23, 2022, recommending that Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment be DENIED and that the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment be GRANTED. ECF No. 18, at 36-37. By copy of the Report and Recommendation, each party was advised of the 1 The Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States has recommended that federal courts use only the first name and last initial of any non-government parties in Social Security cases due to privacy concerns endemic to such cases. Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:21-cv-00666-MSD-RJK Document 19 Filed 01/23/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID# 174
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
