Ange v. Saul, No. 2:2019cv00557 - Document 17 (E.D. Va. 2020)

Court Description: FINAL ORDER: The Court hereby ADOPTS the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge filed on May 6, 2020. Therefore, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute (ECF No. 12) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. Copies of this Order sent as DIRECTED on 6.2.2020.Signed by Chief District Judge Mark S. Davis and filed on 6/2/2020. (epri, )

Download PDF
Ange v. Saul Doc. 17 Case 2:19-cv-00557-MSD-DEM Document 17 Filed 06/02/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID# 110 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division MICHAEL BERNARD ANGE, III, Plaintiff, v. ACTION NO. 2:19cv557 ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. FINAL ORDER Plaintiff Michael Bernard Ange, III, proceeding pro se, brought this action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1383(c)(3) and 405(g) seeking judicial review of the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying his claim for supplemental security income benefits. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(B) and (C) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as well as Rule 72 of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, for a report and recommendation. No. 10. filed on ECF The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge was May 6, 2020, recommending that the Court GRANT the 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:19-cv-00557-MSD-DEM Document 17 Filed 06/02/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID# 111 Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute. 1 16. ECF No. By copy of the Report and Recommendation, each party was advised of the right to file written objections to the findings and recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. No objections were filed by either party. Having reviewed the record, and finding no error, the Court hereby ADOPTS the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge filed on May 6, 2020. Therefore, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute (ECF No. 12) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff is ADVISED that he may appeal from this Final Order by forwarding a written notice of appeal to the Clerk of the United States District Court, United States Courthouse, 600 Granby Street, The Court entered an Order on January 16, 2020 setting out a briefing schedule in which Plaintiff was directed to file within 30 days a Motion for Summary Judgment with memorandum supporting his contentions and containing a statement of undisputed facts. ECF No. 11. Plaintiff failed to file a Motion for Summary Judgment, or otherwise respond to the Court’s direction, by the deadline date, and on March 2, 2020, Defendant moved to have the case dismissed for lack of prosecution. ECF Nos. 12-13. Plaintiff also failed to respond to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. Because Plaintiff failed to respond to the Court’s briefing order, on Aril 9, 2020, the Court issued a Show Cause Order directing Plaintiff to show cause why his Complaint should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute or to comply with the Rules and Order of this Court. ECF No. 15. Plaintiff also failed to respond to the Show Cause Order. In fact, the Court has not received any communication whatsoever from Plaintiff since the filing of his Complaint. 1 2 Case 2:19-cv-00557-MSD-DEM Document 17 Filed 06/02/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID# 112 Norfolk, Virginia 23510. Said written notice must be received by the Clerk within sixty (60) days from the date of this Final Order. The Clerk shall forward a copy of this Final Order to Plaintiff and to counsel of record for Defendant. /s/ Mark S. Davis United States District Judge Norfolk, Virginia June ____, 2020 2 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.