Johnson, for KLB v. Berryhill, No. 2:2018cv00277 - Document 21 (E.D. Va. 2019)

Court Description: FINAL ORDER: This Court has reviewed the R&R and hereby ADOPTS and APPROVES in full the findings and recommendations set forth therein. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 15) is DENIED as detailed in the R&R, and that the Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 17) is GRANTED as detailed in the R&R. Copies of this Order sent as DIRECTED on 7.10.19. Signed by District Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen on 7/9/2019. (epri, )

Download PDF
Johnson, for KLB v. Berryhill Doc. 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FILED FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division JUL 1 0 2019 CLERK. US DISTRICT COURT SARA J. JOHNSON,for KLB, Plaintiff, NORFOLK. VA Civil No.2:18cv277 V. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. FINAL ORDER Plaintiff Sara J. Johnson, proceeding pro se, brought this action on behalf of her minor daughter, KLB,pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 1383(c)(3), seeking judicial review of a decision ofNancy A. Berryhill, the Acting Commissioner ofthe Social Security Administration that denied KLB's claim for Supplemental Security Income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 72 ofthe Rules ofthe United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, and by order of reference (ECF No. 13), this matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge for a Report and Recommendation. In a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") filed June 10, 2019, the Magistrate Judge recommended DENYING Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment(ECF No. 15), GRANTING Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 17), and AFFIRMING the underlying decision of the Commissioner. See R&R,ECF No. 20. By copy of the R&R,each party was advised of the right to file written objections to the findings and recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge within fourteen days from the date 1 Dockets.Justia.com the R&R was mailed, pursuant to Rule 6(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The time for filing written objections has passed, and neither party has filed objections. As indicated in the R&R,"failure to file timely objections to the findings and recommendations set forth [in the R&R] will result in waiver of right to appeal from a judgment of this Court based on such findings and recommendations." Id. at 50. This Court has reviewed the R&R and hereby ADOPTS and APPROVES in full the findings and recommendations set forth therein. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment(ECF No. 15) is DENIED as detailed in the R&R,and that the Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment(ECF No. 17) is GRANTED as detailed in the R&R. The Clerk is REQUESTED to send a copy of this Final Order to all counsel of record. IT IS SO ORDERED. renda^. Wright Allen United States District Judge ,2019 Njmolk,[firgima

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.