Causey v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 2:2013cv00444 - Document 17 (E.D. Va. 2013)

Court Description: ORDER granting 10 Motion to Dismiss; adopting and approve in full the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report and Recommendations. Signed by Chief District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith on 11/12/13. (afar)

Download PDF
Causey v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Doc. 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division MONICA NICOLE CAUSEY, Plaintiff, ACTION NO. v. 2:13cv444 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. FINAL ORDER This matter comes before the court on the defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (ECF No. 10) filed by the defendant on September 10, 2013. The matter was referred to United States Magistrate Douglas E. Miller by Order of September 25, 2013, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b) (1) (B) Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(ECF No. 14). The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation was filed on October 2, 2013 (ECF No. 15) . The Magistrate Judge recommended that the court grant defendant's Motion to Dismiss. By copy of the Report and Recommendation, the parties were advised of their right to file written objections thereto. On October 16, 2013, the court received plaintiff's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 16). The court, having examined the objections to the Report and Recommendation and having made de novo findings with respect thereto, does hereby adopt and approve in full the findings and recommendations Dockets.Justia.com set forth in the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge filed October 2, 2013. Accordingly, the court GRANTS defendant's Motion to Dismiss. The Clerk shall forward a copy of this Final Order to counsel for the parties. It is so ORDERED. W Rebecca Beach Smith _ United States District Judge REBECCA BEACH SMITH CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE November 12, 2013

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.