Robin DiMeglio v. Commissioner of SSA, No. 2:2013cv00413 - Document 22 (E.D. Va. 2015)

Court Description: FINAL ORDER: The Court has reviewed the R&R of Judge Miller (ECF No. 21) and hereby ADOPTS and APPROVES in full the findings and recommendations set forth therein. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Commissioner's Motion for Summary Jud gment (ECF No. 15) is GRANTED, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 12) is DENIED, and the final decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. Copies of Final Order sent to all parties as DIRECTED. Signed by District Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen on 03/02/2015. (epri, )

Download PDF
Robin DiMeglio v. Commissioner of SSA Doc. 22 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 0 -1 2015 ^ Norfolk Division CliRK US. DISTRICT UOURT 'KinRFOLK VA ROBIN DIMEGLIO, Plaintiff, V. CivilNo.2:!3cv413 CAROLYN W. COLVIN. Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendanl. FINAL ORDER Plaintiff Robin DiMeglio brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of the final decision of the Social Security Commissioner ('•Commissioner") denying his claim for disability insurance benefits C'DIB") and supplemental security income C'SSI") pursuant to Title II and Title XVI of ihc Social Security Act. Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 72 of the Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, and by order of reference dated January 6, 2014, this matter was referred to United Slates Magistrate Judge Tommy E. Miller for a Report and Recommendation ("R&R"). In a R&R filed October 7. 2014. Judge Miller found thai the Administrative Law Judge's decision to deny Mr. DiMeglio's claim was supported by substantial evidence. See ECF No. 21 at 15. Accordingly, Judge Miller recommended granting the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment, denying Mr. DiMeglio's motion for summary judgment and affirming the final decision of the Commissioner. Id. at 17. By copy of the R&R, each party was advised of the right to file written objecuons to the fmdings and recommendations made by Judge Miller within fourteen (14) days from the date the Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.