Androus et al v. Androus, No. 1:2024cv01305 - Document 9 (E.D. Va. 2024)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. Signed by District Judge Michael S Nachmanoff on 08/30/2024. (see order for details)(dvanm)

Download PDF
Dockets.Justia.com et al. Plaintiffs Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER I. INTRODUCTION A. Statutory Framework Androus et al v. Androus Doc. 9 Id. See, e.g. Spigner v. Apple Hosp. REIT, Inc. B. II. Procedural Background DISCUSSION See Id. A. The Parties’ Arguments Campbell v. Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. Campbell Id. Campell Id. Spigner Spigner Id. Gibbons v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. Encompass Ins. Co. v. Stone Mansion Rest. Inc. Texas Brine Co., LLC v. Am. Arb. Ass’n, Inc. Campell Campbell B. Persuasive Authority Spignor 1. Campbell Campbell Id. Id. Id. Hillman v. I.R.S. Id. Id. Id. Mach. Co. Green v. Bock Laundry Campbell Id. Campbell Id. 2. Intervening decisions by the courts of appeals Campbell i. Encompass Encompass Id. Id. Id. Id. Id. McMaster v. E. Armored Servs., Inc. Id. Id. Id. ii. Gibbons Gibbons Id. Id. Id. i.e. Id. Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. EPA Id. Encompass Id. Id. iii. Murphy Bros., Inc. v. Mitchetti Pipe Stringing, Inc. Texas Brine Texas Brine Id. Id. Id. Id. Id. Gibbons 3. Spigner Spigner Campbell Spigner Id. Id. Spigner Id. Spigner Campbell Id. 4. Other decisions in this Circuit Encompass Kirst on Behalf of Nominal Defendant Novavax, Inc. v. Erck Medish v. Johns Hopkins Health Sys. Corp. see also Turtle Factory Building Corp. v. McGrath Real Estate Holdings, LLC Goodwin v. Reynolds Blankenship v. Napolitano C. Analysis Hillman v. IRS Sigmon Coal Co. v. Apfel i.e. Id. Sigmon In re Sunterra Corp. Sigmon Coal Hillman Id. Id. Defendants’ Id. Encompass Campbell Spigner plaintiffs Encompass Gibbons Texas Brine Goodwin Gibbons Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Servs., Inc. Hillman Spigner Campbell See Spigner Campbell Spigner Spigner Campbell prevent Campbell See Kirst Spigner Turtle Factory See, e.g. Gibbons Encompass id. See Davis v. USX Corp. III. CONCLUSION ORDERED DENIED SO ORDERED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.