Jackson v. Shanahan, No. 1:2019cv00659 - Document 42 (E.D. Va. 2020)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing that For the reasons stated above, and for good cause shown, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, Dkt. 31 , is hereby GRANTED . Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . Judgment shall issue through a separate Order. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 3/11/2020. (See order for further details). (acha, ) Modified on 3/12/2020 (aott).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Jackson v. Shanahan Doc. 42 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division Marilyn T.Jackson, Plaintiff, Civil No. 1:19-cv-659 Hon. Liam O'Grady V. Mark T.Esper,Secretary of Defense, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Mark T. Esper's Motion for Summary Judgment. Dkt. 31. The motion was fully briefed, and the Court dispensed with oral argument because it would not aid in the decisional process. I. Background Plaintiff Marilyn T. Jackson ("Plaintiff') is an African-American woman over the age of 40. She sued her former employer. Department of Defense Education Activity("DoDEA"), alleging retaliation and discrimination based on race and sex, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act,42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and discrimination based on age, in violation ofthe Age Discrimination in Employment Act,29 U.S.C. § 623. Plaintiff also challenged the Merit Systems Protection Board("MSPB")decision which upheld her removal pursuant to the Civil Service Reform Act, 5 U.S.C.§ 2302. A. Emnlovment in Japan and Subsequent Transfers DoDEA hired Plaintiff in 1998 as a pre-kindergarten teacher, and she worked at a school located on a United States military installation in Japan. On December 10,2007, Plaintiffs three adopted minor daughters contacted the installation's military police. The girls complained of Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
