Navient Solutions, LLC v. The Law Offices of Jeffrey Lohman, et al, No. 1:2019cv00461 - Document 218 (E.D. Va. 2020)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 04/20/2020. (dvanm, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Navient Solutions, LLC v. The Law Offices of Jeffrey Lohman, et al Doc. 218 Case 1:19-cv-00461-LMB-TCB Document 218 Filed 04/20/20 Page 1 of 20 PageID# 3989 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division NAVIENT SOLUTIONS,LLC, Plaintiff, l:19-cv-461 (LMB/TCB) THE LAW OFFICES OF JEFFREY LOHMAN, et al.. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before the Court is defendants The Law Offices of Jeffrey Lohman's and Jeffrey Lohman's (collectively,"LOJL")Objection to the Magistrate Judge's Order Dated March II, 2020("Objection").' In that Order, the magistrate judge denied LOJL's Motion for Reconsideration and imposed sanctions jointly on LOJL and its counsel.^ For the following reasons, LOJL's Objection will be overruled in part and sustained in part. I. BACKGROUND A. PlaintifPs Complaint^ In this civil action, plaintiff Navient Solutions, LLC ("plaintiff or "Navient") generally alleges that the defendants, who are largely debt counseling companies and law firms, as well as various individuals affiliated with them, conspired together to defraud plaintiff out of millions of dollars in outstanding student loan debt in part by manufacturing federal lawsuits and arbitration 'LOJL's Objection is joined only by defendant Jeremy Branch. ^ The magistrate judge also denied LOJL's Motion to Strike. ^ The allegations in this section are drawn from plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint.[See Dkt. 100]. Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:19-cv-00461-LMB-TCB Document 218 Filed 04/20/20 Page 2 of 20 PageID# 3990 Case 1:19-cv-00461-LMB-TCB Document 218 Filed 04/20/20 Page 3 of 20 PageID# 3991 Case 1:19-cv-00461-LMB-TCB Document 218 Filed 04/20/20 Page 4 of 20 PageID# 3992 Case 1:19-cv-00461-LMB-TCB Document 218 Filed 04/20/20 Page 5 of 20 PageID# 3993 Case 1:19-cv-00461-LMB-TCB Document 218 Filed 04/20/20 Page 6 of 20 PageID# 3994 Case 1:19-cv-00461-LMB-TCB Document 218 Filed 04/20/20 Page 7 of 20 PageID# 3995 Case 1:19-cv-00461-LMB-TCB Document 218 Filed 04/20/20 Page 8 of 20 PageID# 3996 Case 1:19-cv-00461-LMB-TCB Document 218 Filed 04/20/20 Page 9 of 20 PageID# 3997 Case 1:19-cv-00461-LMB-TCB Document 218 Filed 04/20/20 Page 10 of 20 PageID# 3998 Case 1:19-cv-00461-LMB-TCB Document 218 Filed 04/20/20 Page 11 of 20 PageID# 3999 Case 1:19-cv-00461-LMB-TCB Document 218 Filed 04/20/20 Page 12 of 20 PageID# 4000 Case 1:19-cv-00461-LMB-TCB Document 218 Filed 04/20/20 Page 13 of 20 PageID# 4001 Case 1:19-cv-00461-LMB-TCB Document 218 Filed 04/20/20 Page 14 of 20 PageID# 4002 Case 1:19-cv-00461-LMB-TCB Document 218 Filed 04/20/20 Page 15 of 20 PageID# 4003 Case 1:19-cv-00461-LMB-TCB Document 218 Filed 04/20/20 Page 16 of 20 PageID# 4004 Case 1:19-cv-00461-LMB-TCB Document 218 Filed 04/20/20 Page 17 of 20 PageID# 4005 Case 1:19-cv-00461-LMB-TCB Document 218 Filed 04/20/20 Page 18 of 20 PageID# 4006 Case 1:19-cv-00461-LMB-TCB Document 218 Filed 04/20/20 Page 19 of 20 PageID# 4007 Case 1:19-cv-00461-LMB-TCB Document 218 Filed 04/20/20 Page 20 of 20 PageID# 4008
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
