Chicas Guevara v. Zanotti, No. 1:2019cv00110 - Document 17 (E.D. Va. 2019)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge T. S. Ellis, III on 8/5/2019. (aott, )

Download PDF
Chicas Guevara v. Zanotti Doc. 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division ABILIO JOSUE CHICAS GUEVARA, Plaintiff, ) ) ) V- ) Civil No. l:19-cv-110 ) ) KIMBERLY ZANOTTI, Washington Field Office Director, United States Citizenship & ) ) Immigration Services, ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION In this declaratory judgment and mandamus immigration case, the parties do not dispute any substantive agency decision resolving plaintiffs application for adjustment ofstatus to that of permanent resident because no such decision has yet been made. Instead, the parties here dispute which entity should make that decision—United States Citizenship & Immigrations Services ("USCIS")at the Department of Homeland Security or the Immigration Court at the Department ofJustice. Although the parties' essential dispute is over which entity is the proper decisionmaker, the manner in which that issue is presented in this case is complicated by the remedies plaintiff seeks. On June 21, 2018, USCIS issued plaintiff a notice advising him that USCIS had administratively closed its proceedings on plaintiffs application for adjustment of status on the ground that USCIS lacked jurisdiction to grant or deny plaintiffs application. In support of its decision, USCIS explained in the notice that the Immigration Court was vested with exclusive jurisdiction to adjudicate plaintiffs adjustment application pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 1245.2(a)(l)(i) because plaintiff(i) was a respondent in a removal proceeding and (ii) was not an arriving alien. Rather than pursuing substantive review of USCIS's decision, plaintiff brought the instant action 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.