Redding v. Meade, No. 1:2018cv00589 - Document 48 (E.D. Va. 2020)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 1/21/2020. (aott, c/m 1/22/2020)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Redding v. Meade Doc. 48 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division Brian Keith Redding Plaintiff, I:18cv589(LMB/TCB) V. Barbara Meade,et ah, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Brian Redding("Redding" or "plaintiff"), a Virginia inmate who suffers from gastrointestinal problems, specifically, Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, has filed a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983, claiming that Rappahannock Regional Jail("RRJ")nurse Barbara Meade("Meade" or "defendant")provided constitutionally deficient medical care in violation ofthe Eighth Amendment.^ [Dkt. No. 1]. Meade has filed a motion for summary judgment,supported by a legal memorandum and exhibits.[Dkt. Nos. 34-35]. Redding received the notice required by Local Rule 7(K)and Roseboro v. Garrison. 528 F.2d 309(4th Cir. 1975), and has filed an opposition to Meade's motion.[Dkt. Nos. 36, 39]. For the reasons that follow, Meade's motion for summary judgment will be granted. 'Plaintiff also named as defendants Jennifer Shearer, a second RRJ nurse, and Phil Grimes,the superintendent ofRRJ. Both defendants were dismissed from this action because Redding did not allege sufficient conduct on their part to establish constitutional liability.[Dkt. No. 29]. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
