Grove v. Dr. Rogers et al, No. 1:2018cv00431 - Document 44 (E.D. Va. 2019)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 04/23/2019. (dvanm, ) (c/s to pro se plaintiff)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Grove v. Dr. Rogers et al Doc. 44 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division Irvin Daniel Grove,Jr., Plaintiff, I:18cv431(LO/JFA) V. Dr. Rogers,et al.. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Irvin Daniel Grove, Jr., a Virginia inmate proceeding pro^("Grove" or "plaintiff), has filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983, alleging that he suffered deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs in two respects at the Riverside Regional Jail("RRJ"), The matter is presently before the Court on the unopposed Motion for Summary Judgment of defendant Dr. Onan Bomar,IV, who is alleged to have violated plaintiffs Eighth Amendment rights in connection with a nasal fracture.' For the reasons which follow, the Motion for Summary Judgment will be granted. I. Background Plaintiff commenced this lawsuit in April, 2018, alleging that defendants at RRJ were deliberately indifferent to(1)a spinal condition and (2)a fractured nose. Dr. Bomar appears to have been named as a defendant solely in connection with the nasal fracture. In the amended complaint, which is the operative complaint in the lawsuit[Dkt. No. 3], Grove's allegations regarding the care he received from Dr. Bomar in full are as follow: On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 I was assulted [sic] and my nose was badly broken. I was taken to Medical and examined by Doctor 'Grove refers to the defendant: as "Dr. Bowmar. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
