Overstock.com, Inc. v. Visocky et al, No. 1:2017cv01331 - Document 112 (E.D. Va. 2018)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 10/17/2018. (dvanm, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Overstock.com, Inc. v. Visocky et al Doc. 112 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division OVERSTOCK.COM,INC., Plaintiff, V. VIKTOR VISOCKY,et al.. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) l:17-cv-01331 (LMB/TCB) MEMORANDUM OPINION Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (the "Report")issued by a magistrate judge on August 23,2018 [Dkt. No. 108], recommending that a defaultjudgment and permanent injunction be entered against defendants Viktor Visocky ("Visocky"), Otto Srams("Srams"), Olga Korischenko ("Korischenko"), and Alexander Bekoev ("Bekoev")(together, the "Named Foreign Defendants") but that no defaultjudgment or injunction be entered against defendant Edward M. Kaufman ("Kaufman")or against 63 websites also named as defendants (the "Website Defendants").' On September 6, 2018, plaintiff filed a partial objection to the Report, arguing that a defaultjudgment and permanent injunction should also be entered against Kaufman and the Website Defendants. No defendant has filed any objection to the Report or any response to plaintiffs objection. For the reasons stated below,the Court will adopt the Report and overrule plaintiffs objection as to the Website Defendants and Kaufman. Accordingly, a defaultjudgment and permanent injunction will be entered against the Named Foreign Defendants. For a complete list ofthe Website Defendants,^Third Am. Compl.[Dkt. No. 88] 1-2. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
