Want v. Frei et al, No. 1:2016cv00660 - Document 66 (E.D. Va. 2017)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION re Motion for summary judgment. Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 1/23/17. Copy mailed to pro se plaintiff by chambers.(klau, )
Download PDF
Want v. Frei et al Doc. 66 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division JEROME WANT, Plaintiff, l:16-cv-660(LMB/IDD) V. STEVEN MARK FREI, et aL, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION PlaintiffJerome Want ("plaintiff" or "Want"), gro se, has filed a six-count complaint alleging malpractice^ and firaud byhis former attorney Steven Mark Frei ("Frei"), and Frei's law firm Sickles, Frei & Mims, P.C., (collectively with Frei, "defendants"), arising out of Frei's representation of Want in a personal injury action filed in the Arlington County Circuit Court. Plaintiff seeks damages of at least $2.59 million plus prejudgment interest at a rate of 12%. Compl. 16-23. Defendants have filed a Motion for Summary Judgment ("Motion"), to which plaintiffhas filed a response.^ The Court finds that oral argument would not aid the decisional process. For the reasons that follow, defendants' motion will be granted. ^Want divides his malpractice claim among five counts: Count 1(Failure to Provide a Minimum Standard of Care); Count 2 (Malpractice); Count 4 (Breach of Contract); Count 5 (NonFeasance); and Count 6 (Malfeasance). Compl. 16-17; 20-22. ^Although defendants served plaintiff with a Roseboro notice along with their motion, advising him that he must "identify all facts stated by Defendants with which [he] disagree[s] and set forth [his] version of the facts by offering affidavits (written statements signed before a notary public and imder oath) or by filing sworn statements (bearing a certificate that is signed under penalty ofpeijury)," plaintiffs response consists solely of argument, failing to cite any evidence in the record, see generally PI. 0pp. [Dkt. 64]. Moreover, those arguments have not been submitted imder penalty of peijury. See id. Dockets.Justia.com