Dauphin v. Jennings et al, No. 1:2015cv00149 - Document 407 (E.D. Va. 2017)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 6/8/2017. (dest, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Dauphin v. Jennings et al Doc. 407 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division Katherine R. Dauphin, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. l:15-cv-149 Hon. Liam O'Grady Hon. Theresa Buchanan Louis A. Jennings and Beverly L. Hennager, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Thismatter comes before the Courton the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Buchanan dated May 5,2017 (the "May 5 Report"). (Dkt. No. 396). Defendant Louis Jennings, by and through counsel, filed an objection to the Report. Defendant Beverly Hennager filed an objection to the report pro se. Based on a review of the Report, the objections and responses therewith, and the supporting exhibits, the Court ADOPTS the findings and recommendations of Magistrate Judge Buchanan. Further, Interested Party Michael Jennings' Supplemental Motion for Attorney's Fees (Dkt. No. 312)is GRANTED IN PART. The Special Masteris instructed to pay $67,696.50 to Harris, St. Laurent & Chaudhry LLP and $176,614.49 to Roeder & Cochran PLLC from the undistributed share of the assets of the Kay Jennings Family Limited Partnership. I. Background The history of this case has been thoroughly documented in prior orders. See, e.g., Dkt. Nos. 341,389. Accordingly, the Court focuses this factual recitation on the events germane to the May 5 Report. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
