Barker v. Computer Sciences Corporation, No. 1:2013cv00857 - Document 118 (E.D. Va. 2015)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 3/27/2015. (rban, )

Download PDF
Barker v. Computer Sciences Corporation Doc. 118 E 1 l E n) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT mz&m -( FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA Alexandria Division Damien Barker. Plaintiff, Civil No. l:13-cv-857 -v- Ion. Liam O'Grady Computer Science Corporation, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before the Court are the defendant's motions for summary judgment and to strike certain of plaintiffs exhibits. (Dkt. Nos. 74, 86). The plaintiff has opposed both motions. (Dkt. Nos. 81, 92), and the defendant has replied. (Dkt. Nos. 89, 94). Having carefully considered the pleadings and exhibits and heard oral argument, the Court hereby GRANTS summary judgment. The motion to strike is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Damien Barker ("Plaintiff or "Barker") began his employment with Computer Science Corporation ("CSC") in February 2011 as a systems analyst. (Dkt. No. 77-6 at 2-3). In this position, he provided technical support to the United States Marine Corps ("Marine Corps"), a CSC client. Plaintiffs immediate supervisor was Nick Avenetti ("Avenetti"), and his secondary supervisor was Program Manager Judith Shaw ("Shaw"). Id. Captain Howard Smith ("Capt. Smith") served as the Marine Corps Operations Officer at Camp Pendleton. Id. Richard Pennington ("Pennington") was CSC*s Operations Director. (Dkt. No. 77-3 at 2). Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.