Pope v. Wells Fargo Bank N A et al, No. 2:2023cv00086 - Document 32 (D. Utah 2024)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER adopting in full 31 Report and Recommendations: JPMorgan Chase Bank's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 22 ) is GRANTED and Plaintiff's claims against JPMorgan Chase Bank are DISMISSED without prejudice. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 25 ) is GRANTED and Plaintiff's claims against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. are DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 2/9/24. (dle)

Download PDF
Pope v. Wells Fargo Bank N A et al Doc. 32 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH JILLANE L. POPE, Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; JPMORGAN CHASE BANK & COMPANY, N.A.; JON PETERSON, an individual; ERIC JOHN, an individual; and KEN LONG, an individual, Case No. 2:23-CV-00086-JNP-DBP District Judge Jill N. Parrish Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead Defendants. Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead issued a Report and Recommendation that the court grant the motions to dismiss filed by Defendants JPMorgan Chase Bank (ECF No. 22) and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (ECF No. 25). See ECF No. 31. Judge Pead notified the parties that a failure to file a timely objection to his recommendation could waive any objections to it. No party filed a timely objection to the Report and Recommendation and any argument that it was in error has thus been waived. See United States v. One Parcel of Real Prop., 73 F.3d 1057, 1060 (10th Cir. 1996). The court will decline to apply the waiver rule only if “the interests of justice so dictate.” Moore v. United States, 950 F.2d 656, 659 (10th Cir. 1991); see also Duffield v. Jackson, 545 F.3d 1234, 1238 (10th Cir. 2008) (listing factors to apply in determining whether the interests of justice require an exception to the waiver rule). The court does not find an exception to the waiver rule required in the interests of justice. Thus, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the court concludes it is not clearly erroneous and ADOPTS IN FULL the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the court ORDERS as follows: Dockets.Justia.com 1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 31) is ADOPTED IN FULL. 2. JPMorgan Chase Bank’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 22) is GRANTED and Plaintiff’s claims against JPMorgan Chase Bank are DISMISSED without prejudice. 3. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 25) is GRANTED and Plaintiff’s claims against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. are DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed February 9, 2024 BY THE COURT ______________________________ Jill N. Parrish United States District Court Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.