Joyner v. Rivera et al, No. 2:2022cv00720 - Document 19 (D. Utah 2023)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER DISMISSING CASE. IT IS ORDERED that--for failure to obey the Court's order and to prosecute this case--Plaintiff's action is DISMISSED without prejudice. See DUCivR 41-2. This action is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 10/30/2023. (eat)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Joyner v. Rivera et al Doc. 19 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH MICHAEL ERNEST LEE JOYNER SR., Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION & DISMISSAL ORDER v. Case No. 2:22-CV-720 DAK SHERIFF ROSIE RIVERA et al., District Judge Dale A. Kimball Defendants. Plaintiff has not responded to the Court's September 18, 2023, order to within a final thirty days show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to comply with the Court's order to submit an initial partial filing fee. (ECF No. 17.) And, Plaintiff has not since updated Plaintiff's address with the Court as required. See D. Utah Civ. R. 83-1.3(e) ("In all cases, counsel and parties appearing pro se must notify the clerk's office immediately of any change in address, email address, or telephone number."). Indeed, the latest item that the Court mailed to Plaintiff was returned to sender, marked, "UNABLE TO FORWARD" and "PRISONER RELEASED." (ECF No. 18.) Dockets.Justia.com Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that--for failure to obey the Court’s order and to prosecute this case--Plaintiff's action is DISMISSED without prejudice. See DUCivR 41-2. This action is CLOSED. DATED this 30th day of October 2023. BY THE COURT: DALE A. KIMBALL United States District Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
