Brown v. Hill, No. 2:2022cv00435 - Document 20 (D. Utah 2023)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION AND DISMISSAL ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 9/5/2023. (eat)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Brown v. Hill Doc. 20 Case 2:22-cv-00435-DAK Document 20 Filed 09/05/23 PageID.77 Page 1 of 2 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH JUSTIN F. BROWN, Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM DECISION & DISMISSAL ORDER Case No. 2:22-CV-435 DAK BLAKE HILLS, District Judge Dale A. Kimball Defendant. On July 31, 2023, the Court ordered Plaintiff to within thirty days show cause why the Complaint, (ECF No. 5), should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (ECF No. 19.) The Court gave a detailed analysis explaining the claims' invalidity. (Id.) Plaintiff has not responded and has not been heard from in this case since Plaintiff's request for documents was fulfilled by the Court on December 27, 2022, more than eight months ago. (ECF No. 18.) The analysis in the Order to Show Cause therefore stands unchallenged. (ECF No. 19.) Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:22-cv-00435-DAK Document 20 Filed 09/05/23 PageID.78 Page 2 of 2 Based on that analysis, IT IS ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See 28 U.S.C.S. ยง 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2023). DATED this 5th day of September, 2023. BY THE COURT: DISTRICT JUDGE DALE A. KIMBALL United States District Court 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
