Utah First Federal Credit Union v. University First Federal Credit Union, No. 2:2022cv00146 - Document 69 (D. Utah 2023)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION and Order: granting 64 Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document and granting 67 Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 07/20/2023. (jl)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Utah First Federal Credit Union v. University First Federal Credit Union Doc. 69 Case 2:22-cv-00146-RJS-DBP Document 69 Filed 07/20/23 PageID.609 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION UTAH FIRST FEDERAL CREDIT UNION MEMORANDUM DECISION AND dba UTAH FIRST CREDIT UNION, a federal ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR credit union, LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL Plaintiff, Case No. 2:22-cv-00146-RJS-DBP v. Chief Judge Robert J. Shelby UNIVERSITY FIRST FEDERAL CREDIT UNION dba UFIRST CREDIT UNION, a federal credit union, Chief Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead Defendants. Defendants seek leave to file under seal portions of their Amended Answer to Amended Complaint for Trademark Infringement and Counterclaim. (ECF No. 67.) For good cause shown the court grants the motion. “The records of the court are presumptively open to the public,” and sealing court documents is “highly discouraged.” DUCivR 5-3(a)(1). The right of access to judicial records, however, is not absolute. Colony Ins. Co. v. Burke, 698 F.3d 1222, 1241 (10th Cir. 2012). “[T]he presumption in favor of access to judicial records may be overcome where countervailing interests heavily outweigh the public interests in access.” Id. (internal quotation marks omitted). “The burden is on the party seeking to restrict access to show some significant interest that outweighs the presumption.” Id. (internal quotation marks omitted). Here, Defendants state that the information to be filed under seal includes information that might harm Defendants as it “consists of Plaintiff’s false, misleading and defamatory statements concerning Defendant, Defendant’s business practices, and Defendant’s Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:22-cv-00146-RJS-DBP Document 69 Filed 07/20/23 PageID.610 Page 2 of 2 trademarks.” (ECF No. 67 p. 5.) Defendants further assert that the sealed information has been narrowly tailored to include only that which should be protected. The court is persuaded that the presumption to public access to judicial records is overcome in this instance due to the countervailing interests. Thus, the motion is GRANTED. DATED this 20 July 2023. Dustin B. Pead United States Magistrate Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
