Montague v. Wright et al, No. 2:2020cv00483 - Document 9 (D. Utah 2020)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE - IT IS ORDERED that, because Plaintiff did not follow the Court's order to file an IPFF and consent, and has failed to prosecute this case, see DUCivR 41-2, Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. This action is CLOSED. Signed by Judge David Barlow on 10/27/20. (jrj)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Montague v. Wright et al Doc. 9 Case 2:20-cv-00483-DBB Document 9 Filed 10/27/20 PageID.31 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH MICHAEL MONTAGUE, Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION & DISMISSAL ORDER v. CAMERON WRIGHT et al., Defendants. Case No. 2:20-CV-483-DBB District Judge David B. Barlow In an Order dated August 28, 2020, the Court required Plaintiff to within thirty days pay an initial partial filing fee (IPFF) of $34.37 and submit a consent to have the remaining fee collected in increments from Plaintiff’s inmate account. (ECF No. 8.) To date, Plaintiff has not complied, nor has Plaintiff responded to the Order. Indeed, Plaintiff has not contacted the Court since July 27, 2020--three months ago. (ECF No. 6.) IT IS ORDERED that, because Plaintiff did not follow the Court's order to file an IPFF and consent, and has failed to prosecute this case, see DUCivR 41-2, Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. This action is CLOSED. BY THE COURT: JUDGE DAVID B. BARLOW United States District Court Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
