Redmond v. Salt Lake County Jail et al, No. 2:2019cv01008 - Document 20 (D. Utah 2020)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER TO CURE DEFICIENT COMPLAINT: denying 10 Motion for preliminary injunctive relief; denying 11 Motion to Compel; denying 15 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying 16 Motion for Preliminary Injunction . It is hereby ordered: Plaintiff must within Thirty Days cure the Complaint's deficiencies noted above by filing a document entitled "Amended Complaint", that does not refer to or include any other documents. The Clerk's Office s hall mail Plaintiff the Pro Se Litigant Guide with a blank-form-civil rights complaint which Plaintiff must use if he wishes to pursue an amended complaint. If Plaintiff fails to timely cure the deficiencies, this action may be dismissed. See order for details. Signed by Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr on 06/24/2020. (kpf)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Dockets.Justia.com MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER TO CURE DEFICIENT COMPLAINT pro se see COMPLAINT’S DEFICIENCIES Redmond v. Salt Lake County Jail et al Doc. 20 See Smith v. Lawton Corr. Facility GUIDANCE FOR PLAINTIFF TV Commc'ns Network, Inc. v ESPN, Inc. Hall v. Bellmon Id. Dunn v. White See Murray v. Archambo See Bennett v. Passic who what whom Stone v. Albert Robbins v. Oklahoma Robbins Bell Atlantic Corp. v Twombly Id See Mitchell v. Maynard Gallagher v. Shelton Jones v. Bock • Affirmative Link Vasquez v. Davis Pahls v. Thomas see also Robbins v. Oklahoma what who Tonkovich v. Kan. Bd. of Regents whom Estate of Roemer v. Johnson Id Id • Legal Access Ramos v. Lamm Bounds v. Smith Id Penrod v. Zavaras Carper v. Deland Treff v. Galetka Carper accord Lewis v. Casey • Inadequate Medical Treatment Craig v. Eberly Barney v. Pulsipher sufficiently harmful Olson v. Stotts Estelle v. Gamble Wilson v. Seiter Sealock Farmer v. Brennan Sparks v. Singh Estelle v. Gamble Perkins v. Kan. Dep’t of Corrs., see also Gee v. Pacheco MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL pro bono See Carper v. Deland Bee v. Utah State Prison See Carper Williams v. Meese McCarthy v. Weinberg Rucks v. Boergermann Williams accord McCarthy ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED (1) (2) (3) (4) See in forma pauperis (5) See pro se See (6) 14 days (7) (8) (9) DENIED DENIED
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
